Legal Opinion

East v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1940No. 4-6274Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaNey, J.

Appellant is a resident, qualified elector and property owner of the City of Camden, a city of the first class. Appellees, other than the city, are its mayor and aldermen. On September 5, 1940, the city council adopted an ordinance submitting to the voters of the city three separate and distinct proposed improvements to be constructed and for the issuance of bonds under Amendment No. 13 to the constitution to pay the cost of such improvements, as follows: (1) $8,000 for the construction, widening and straightening of streets and alleys in the city; (2) $7,000 for the construction of sewers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Railey v. City of MagnoliaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Todd v. McCloySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Rhodes v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Atkinson v. Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Shull v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API