Legal Opinion

Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of Rector

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 1949No. 4-8729PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the endeavor to construct and operate a municipal light plant and distribution system in and for the City of Rector, the council of that city passed Ordinance 212 on February 12, 1946, entitled:

"An Ordinance Calling, Authorizing, and Directing a Special Election to be Held in the City of Rector, Arkansas, for the Purpose of Testing the Sense of the Qualified Voters of Said City upon a Proposition to Issue and Sell Bonds on Said City of Rector in the Amount of $65,000, with the Proceeds of Which to Build and Construct an Electric Light Plant in and for Said City and to Provide a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. RothrockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. McCarroll, Commr. of Revs. v. Gregory-Robinson-SpeasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Hoffman v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Neal v. City of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Cisco v. Caudle, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Rich v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Curry v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Maas v. City of Mountain HomeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Williams v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API