Legal Opinion

Whetstone v. City of Stuttgart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1936No. 4-4568PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

Stuttgart, a city of the first class, on September 6, 1935, passed an ordinance providing for an election to be held on October 17, 1935, at which election was submitted the proposal to issue the bonds of the city in the sum of $75,000. The bonds, as provided in said ordinance, were to bear interest from November 1, 1935, and the first maturity was to be November 1, 1938, and the last maturity to be November 1, 1949. The proposal was adopted by a majority of the votes and it was so proclaimed.

No bonds have yet been signed, dated, or sold. On October 5, 1936, the appellant, F. O. Whetstone,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gage v. McCordArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hargraves v. SolomonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Rhodes v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Crow v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API