Legal Opinion

Hargraves v. Solomon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The record shows that some of the bonds proposed to be issued will mature less than three years from the date of issue. Counsel for the defendant seek to reverse the decree on the ground that the provision in the Thirteenth Amendment to our Constitution, providing that such bonds shall be serial, maturing annually after three years from the date of issue, is directory, and that the court erred in holding the provision to be mandatory.

The correctness of the holding of the chancery court depends upon the construction to be placed upon that part of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1870
  2. Merwin v. FussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HurlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Parkin Prtg. & Stat. Co. v. Ark. Prtg. & Litho. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Rhodes v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen Cty. Bd. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Whetstone v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API