Legal Opinion
Schwardt v. County of Watonwan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 13, 2003No. C8-01-1136PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellants Sharon and Bernhardt Schwardt challenge the court of appeals’ decision upholding the Watonwan County Board’s grant of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a confined hog-feeding operation. The Schwardts contend that the board’s grant of the CUP was unreasonable and arbitrary because the board failed to properly consider the potential adverse health effects of the proposed feedlot, overlooked a setback requirement in the governing ordinance, and failed to support the grant of the CUP with sufficient findings. We affirm the court of appeals’ decision to affirm the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- RDNT, LLC v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Eagle Lake of Becker County Lake Ass'n v. Becker County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Bartheld v. County of KoochichingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.