Legal Opinion
Bartheld v. County of Koochiching
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 11, 2006No. A05-2124PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Relators Jeff and Dana Bartheld challenge respondent Koochiching County’s denial of their conditional-use-permit application, arguing that the denial was arbitrary and capricious because they met the requirements under the county’s ordinance for the permit. Koochiching County argues that the denial was justified by the adoption of a moratorium ordinance 1 that applied to all bed-and-breakfast applications within the county. Because the moratorium ordinance was invalid and the county’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Relators Jeff and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- MUSTANG RUN WIND PROJECT, LLC v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Bio Wood Processing, LLC, Relator v. Rice County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015