Legal Opinion
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 2003No. C1-01-2127PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In this case we decide whether the City of Minneapolis (the City) acted unreasonably, arbitrarily, or capriciously in designating an area near downtown Minneapolis as an historic preservation district. Respondent, Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA), owns four buildings in the designated district. By writ of certiorari, BGEA challenged the City’s designation and the court of appeals granted relief to BGEA. The City appeals.
Minnesota Statutes § 471.193 announces a state policy that the “historical, architectural, archaeological, engineering, and cultural heritage…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 500, LLC v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- RDNT, LLC v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Eagle Lake of Becker County Lake Ass'n v. Becker County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- CEMETERY v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003