Berner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
This is an appeal which we allowed from an order of the Superior Court (Berner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 177 Pa. Superior Ct. 19, 107 A. 2d 882), affirming, by a sharply divided vote, a final order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission which had approved an increase in rates requested under tariff supplements filed by the Commonwealth Telephone Company in November, 1952,
The principal issue involved concerns the nature and extent of the burden of a utility to establish in a rate case the reasonableness of its dealings with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Bluefield Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Penn Sheraton Hotel v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Johnstown v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.