Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1956No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
This is an appeal by the City of Pittsburgh from the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of October 18, 1955. The appeal presents to us for review two issues arising in the rate case of The Manufacturers Light and Heat Company — rate of return- and rate structure. These issues, inter alia, were previously before us in Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 46, 72, 112 A. 2d 826, allocatur refused, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. xxviii.
The Manufacturers Light and Heat Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Columbia Gas System,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Railroad Commission v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- State Corp. Commission of Kan. v. Federal Power Commission. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.