Legal Opinion

Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. Driscoll

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1941No. Appeal, 35PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania filed a bill in equity asking for an injunction restraining the defendants from enforcing against it Section 702 * of the Public Utility Law of 1937, as amended by Act of September 28, 1938, P. L. 44 (66 PS §1272). Tbe defendants moved to dismiss tbe bill for want of jurisdiction and tbe plaintiff secured a rule to show cause wby a preliminary injunction should not be granted. Tbe chancellor dismissed the preliminary objections to tbe bill and after bearing granted a preliminary injunction. Certain stipulations were filed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. New York Central Securities Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API