Legal Opinion

State v. Casiano

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 22, 2010No. AC 30587PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The self-represented defendant, Jason Casiano, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that the court erred in (1) denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence and (2) declining to appoint appellate counsel. We disagree with the merits of the defendant’s first claim and dismiss the second claim, as it is not properly before us.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant. “In 1995, the defendant was arrested and charged with felony murder, attempt to commit robbery in the first degree…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Gordon v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. KoslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. RoblesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. State v. AlegrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. State v. MongeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Moore v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API