Legal Opinion
State v. Koslik
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 1, 2009No. AC 29673PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Richard Koslik, appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, he claims that his sentence is illegal because the term of probation exceeds the permissible statutory maximum for violations of General Statutes § 20-427 (b) (3) and (5). We conclude that the record is inadequate for our review and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following factual and procedural history is relevant to our discussion. The defendant had been convicted of representing himself falsely as or impersonating a registered home…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. CasianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.