State v. Casiano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
This case comes before us on a motion for review filed by the defendant, Jason Casiano, who is indigent, challenging the trial court’s denial of his application for the appointment of counsel in connection with his appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that General Statutes § 51-296 (a) 2 entitles him to the assistance of counsel for the purpose of appealing the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We agree with the defendant. 3
The following undisputed facts and procedural history are relevant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. CasianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.