Legal Opinion

State v. Casiano

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 29, 2007No. SC 17600PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

This case comes before us on a motion for review filed by the defendant, Jason Casiano, who is indigent, challenging the trial court’s denial of his application for the appointment of counsel in connection with his appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that General Statutes § 51-296 (a) 2 entitles him to the assistance of counsel for the purpose of appealing the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We agree with the defendant. 3

The following undisputed facts and procedural history are relevant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  4. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. State v. CasianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API