Legal Opinion

State v. Monge

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 2016No. AC37699PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGruendel, J.

The defendant, Javier R. Monge, appeals from the judgments of the trial court dismissing his postsentencing motion to vacate his guilty pleas and to open the judgments of conviction. The dispositive issue is whether the court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of that motion. We answer that query in the affirmative and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The defendant, who is not a citizen of the United States, was involved in two domestic altercations on June 16, 2013, and August 12, 2013. He…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. CasianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RoblesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. State v. Gang JinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. McPhersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. State v. MongeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API