Legal Opinion

In Re Corizzi

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2002No. 01-BG-314PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Respondent Anthony Corizzi excepts from the unanimous recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility(“the Board”) that he be disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. 1 Athough he was found to have committed a telling number of ethical violations, most particularly he counseled two clients, in separate cases, to commit perjury in their depositions, which they did to the virtual destruction of their causes. We accept the Board’s recommendation and disbar respondent.

In reviewing a disciplinary recommendation of the Board, this court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re PenningtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API