Legal Opinion

United States v. Kruempelman

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 31, 1985No. SPCM 21467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COMEAU, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by military judge sitting as a special court-martial of possession of cocaine and unauthorized absence. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 39 days, forfeiture of $400 pay per month for two months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellant asserts, personally and through counsel, that the military judge erred by admitting into evidence statements of the appellant which were tainted by a previous unwarned interrogation. Ap*696pell…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. SeayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CarterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. NewArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. BolandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. AskewU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API