Legal Opinion
United States v. Carter
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided June 20, 1986No. CM 447485PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MARDEN, Senior Judge:
Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a court composed of officer members of the offenses of rape and violating a lawful general order1 in violation of Articles 120 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter cited as UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 892. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for six months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence.
Appellant contends under Military Rule of Evidence (MRE)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. SilvisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. CoxU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.