Legal Opinion
United States v. Seay
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided November 7, 1975No. 29,600PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
After receiving several inquiries from the local post exchange concerning checks of Specialist Seay which had been returned for insufficient funds, Captain Knauer in his capacity as troop commander “informally” counseled the accused with regard to his “moral and legal [obligation] to take care of his bad checks.” Only after the third such session did Captain Knauer finally advise the accused of his rights under Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 831(b).
Although he admitted suspecting the accused of a criminal offense and acknowledged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Reck v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Clewis v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Darwin v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. JacobyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. LoukasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. LewisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.