Bank of Anderson v. Home Insurance
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was on a fire insurance policy, and from the judgment in favor of plaintiff and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial this appeal has been taken. The trial was had before a jury who made special findings upon various issues and also rendered a general verdict in favor of .plaintiff for the amount of the policy. The policy was issued December 13, 1906, to Seaman Brothers, through one Barkuloo, the local agent of defendant at Anderson, Shasta county. The plaintiff had' advanced said Seaman Brothers money to start them in business, and had the loss under the policy made…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chase v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Montana Auto Finance Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- Ruffino v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.