Legal Opinion
Ruffino v. Queen Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1934No. Civ. No. 5046PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment of $2,714.80 which was rendered against it by the court sitting without a jury, in a suit upon an insurance policy for loss by fire of certain personal property.
Through its Stanislaus County agent, J. F. Campbell, the defendant insurance company, on September 26, 1930, on receipt of $67.50 which was paid as premium therefor, *531issued to the plaintiffs jointly, as their interests appeared, a standard statutory form of fire insurance policy for $4,500, for the period of one year, on certain personal property owned by the plaintiff Ruffino, subject to a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Atlas Reduction Co. v. New Zealand Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Heim v. American Alliance Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Gazzam v. German Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- People v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Watson v. Stockton Morris Plan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Alta California Regional Center v. Fremont Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.