Legal Opinion

Montana Auto Finance Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1929No. 6,444PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ford

Samuel M. Weekes was employed by plaintiff as its secretary and treasurer. Defendant, by its bond duly executed and delivered, on June 12, 1923, undertook to reimburse plaintiff “for such pecuniary loss as the employer [plaintiff] shall sustain of money, * # * belonging to the employer for which the employer is responsible, amounting to any act or acts of larceny or embezzlement on the part of the employee,” etc. The bond was effective for one year. On June 10, 1924, in consideration of an additional premium, it was renewed and extended until June 20, 1925.

This action was brought to recover…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sentinel Life Ins. Co. v. BlackmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., a Corporation v. Coleman C. Murnion and Virginia MurnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Bickford v. BickfordMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Tacoma School District No. 10 v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API