Goldston v. Wright
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PER Cubiam.
The rule is thoroughly established in this jurisdiction that when a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808; 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329. The record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Brink v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goldston v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- Scott v. TrogdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Gilbert v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.