Legal Opinion

Selph v. Selph

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1966No. 694PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

No two rules are better settled in North Carolina than these:(1) The trial judge has the discretionary power to set aside a verdict when, in his opinion, it would work injustice to let it stand; and, if.no question of law or legal inference is involved in the motion, his action in so doing is not subject to review .on appeal in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion. Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E. 2d 462; Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; Roberts v. Hill, 240 N.C. 373, 82 S.E. 2d 373; Pruitt v. Ray, 230 N.C. 322, 52 S.E. 2d 876; 4 Strong, N. C. Index, Trial § 48…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Will of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Garrison v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API