Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. State, Dept. of Licensing

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 29, 1997No. 14978-1-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.

In this habitual traffic offender proceeding, we are asked to decide whether traffic convictions by a tribal court should be included in the 20 convictions required before the State can suspend a driver’s license under the habitual traffic offender statute. See RCW 46.65.020(2). We conclude that they can and affirm the trial court.

A habitual traffic offender is anyone who has been convicted of 20 or more traffic infractions "that are required to be reported to the department of licensing . . . .” RCW 46.65.020(2). The habitual traffic offender statute references those state convictions or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Medcalf v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Medcalf v. State, Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Merseal v. State Dept. of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API