Wheeler v. State, Dept. of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.
In this habitual traffic offender proceeding, we are asked to decide whether traffic convictions by a tribal court should be included in the 20 convictions required before the State can suspend a driver’s license under the habitual traffic offender statute. See RCW 46.65.020(2). We conclude that they can and affirm the trial court.
A habitual traffic offender is anyone who has been convicted of 20 or more traffic infractions "that are required to be reported to the department of licensing . . . .” RCW 46.65.020(2). The habitual traffic offender statute references those state convictions or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Medcalf v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Medcalf v. State, Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Merseal v. State Dept. of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.