Legal Opinion
State v. Scheffel
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1973No. 42637PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
These are consolidated cases in which the appellants (defendants), Richard R. Scheffel and Hideo Saiki, raise several constitutional objections to the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act, RCW 46.65 (effective August 9, 1971).
The facts as stipulated to by counsel are as follows. On February 10, 1972, the defendants were ordered to appear in the Superior Court for Spokane County to show cause why they should not be barred as habitual offenders from operating motor vehicles on the highways of the state. Subsequent to the signing of the order, the defendants were each served with the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
- Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- O'DAY v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.