Medcalf v. State, Dept. of Licensing
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
944 P.2d 1014 (1997)
133 Wash.2d 290
Thomas R. MEDCALF, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Respondent.
No. 64509-4.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
October 2, 1997.
Prince, Kelley, Marshall & Coombs, David S. Marshall, Seattle, for petitioner.
Christine O. Gregoire, Atty. Gen., James Schmid, Asst. Atty. Gen., Seattle, for respondent.
GUY, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether a driver who refuses to take a breath alcohol test as required by the implied consent law, RCW 46.20.308, may challenge the subsequent revocation of his license on the ground that he suffers…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.