State v. Krall
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
This is a direct appeal from an order of restitution. We reverse.
The only issue is whether the trial court may order restitution more than 60 days after sentencing when the statute provides: "When restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within sixty days.” (Italics ours.) RCW 9.94A.142(1).
The Judgment and Sentence did not set restitution, but provided: "If State seeks restitution, it shall be by motion and hearing.” Clerk’s Papers, at 6. The State did not seek a hearing until more than 60 days after sentencing. The hearing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Vita Food Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HartwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. HuntzingerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by131 opinions
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Nelson v. McGoldrickWashington Supreme Court · 1995
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.