Medcalf v. Department of Licensing
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— The issue in this case is whether a driver who refuses to take a breath alcohol test as required by the implied consent law, RCW 46.20.308, may challenge the subsequent revocation of his license on the ground that he suffers from a mental disorder which prevented him from refusing or from taking the test.
We hold that the existence of a mental disorder which is not manifested by objective, physical symptoms, so as to permit the arresting officer to administer a blood test, is not a defense for refusing to submit to a breath test and is not relevant to the issues to be resolved in a license…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cowles Publishing Co. v. State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Timberline Air Service, Inc. v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.