Legal Opinion

Medcalf v. Department of Licensing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1997No. 64509-4PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— The issue in this case is whether a driver who refuses to take a breath alcohol test as required by the implied consent law, RCW 46.20.308, may challenge the subsequent revocation of his license on the ground that he suffers from a mental disorder which prevented him from refusing or from taking the test.

We hold that the existence of a mental disorder which is not manifested by objective, physical symptoms, so as to permit the arresting officer to administer a blood test, is not a defense for refusing to submit to a breath test and is not relevant to the issues to be resolved in a license…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cowles Publishing Co. v. State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Timberline Air Service, Inc. v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API