Legal Opinion

State v. Merritt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 20, 1998No. 39775-3-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

— In an implied consent case, we reject Brian Merritt’s claim that “qualified technicians” who draw blood pursuant to RCW 46.61.506(4) are subject to the permit requirements of RCW 46.61.506(3) for those analyzing blood samples, and, in addition, find sufficient evidence to support his conviction.

FACTS

Merritt drove a car that was involved in a one-car ac cident in which his sole passenger, Nicole Bianco, died at the scene. Merritt lost control of his car, hit a large rock, and flipped into a tree. Nicole died shortly after the accident of internal injuries consistent with being a passenger in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Spence v. KaminskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Spence v. KaminskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. ArguetaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API