Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Whitten

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2007No. AC 27164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

This appeal arises out of an action by the plaintiff, Emellie Anderson, to recover damages from the defendant, Kenneth Whitten, for unsatisfactory performance of two home improvement contracts. The trial court found the defendant liable under a theory of common-law negligence and awarded the plaintiff $10,000. On appeal, the defendant argues that (1) the complaint did not properly state a claim of negligence, (2) the court improperly credited the testimony of one of the plaintiffs expert witnesses and (3) the court’s factual findings were unsupported by the evidence. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Wray v. Fairfield Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Tedesco v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. TOWN OF TRUMBULL v. PalmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Giannamore v. ShevchukConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Palmieri v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API