Legal Opinion

Palmieri v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 7, 2007No. AC 27835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this premises liability case, the plaintiff, Gloria Palmieri, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendants, Stop & Shop Companies, Inc., Kate Realty Company, Inc., and Montowese Industrial Park, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that she failed to prove that a defect existed that caused her to trip and fall. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts found by the court in its memorandum of decision are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. On…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cruz v. DrezekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Lisiewski v. SeidelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Martin v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Anderson v. WhittenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McSwainConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Gibson v. Denmo's Original Drive-In, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API