Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. City of Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 2, 1992No. 14301PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal and cross appeal is whether a municipal employee whose employment was terminated was afforded his fourteenth amendment right to procedural due process by the union grievance procedures established under a collective bargaining agreement.1 The plaintiff, Benjamin Tedesco,2 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s award to the plaintiff of compensatory damages and attorney’s fees for the violation of 42 U.S.C. § 19833 by the defendant, the city *235of Stamford.4 The defendant cross appeals from the judgment of the Appellate…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API