Legal Opinion

Amos v. Cummings

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1949No. 810PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal by a tenant from a judgment for possession -in favor of the landlord. The house in question is located in that part of the District known as Georgetown. It was formerly zoned “First Commercial” and the basement was used for commercial purposes. Prior to execution of the lease here involved the property was rezoned “Residential.” The landlord has sought to preserve the right to uSte the basement for commercial purposes as a nonconforming rise under the zoning law1 and to that end secured a certificate of occupancy for the continued use of the basement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Hartman v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Wood v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Congressional Amusement Corp. v. WeltmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Southall Realty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Ingannamorte v. Kings Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Stevens v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Ostrow v. Horning, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API