Legal Opinion
Wood v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 1944No. Nos. 201, 202PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Appellant was charged and convicted (1) of operating a livery stable without having obtained the appropriate license, and (2) of having changed the use of certain premises without having first obtained a certificate of occupancy from the Inspector of Buildings. Fines were imposed and we granted an appeal.
Counsel have agreed that the sole issue is whether appellant was required to obtain an occupancy certificate before engaging in business on the premises involved. Section XX of the Zoning Regulations1 does not require an occupancy certificate for “the continuance of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Cochran v. RoemerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Morehouse v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kubby v. HammondArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rosenthal v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Dandy Co. v. Civil City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lenkin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.