George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This case presents two principal questions: (1) whether the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA or the Board) properly concluded that intervenor has not abandoned his right to nonconforming use of his property, and (2) whether the Board erred in failing to take specific account of the effect of the proposed change in nonconforming use from a clothing store to a restaurant on the campus plan of George *1344Washington University (GWU or the University). Petitioner contests numerous other findings and conclusions of the Board. Finding no merit in any of these contentions, we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Palmer v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Town of Darien v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jones & Artis Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cathedral Park Condominium Committee v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.