Legal Opinion

Congressional Amusement Corp. v. Weltman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1947No. 545PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Appellant sued for possession of store property, charging that the lessees had violated their lease by discontinuing the operation of a liquor store in the premises. The lease was for three years ending November. 30, 1947. This is the covenant allegedly violated:

“That he will use said premises for the sale of alcoholic beverages and other items usually associated with the sale of liquor for “Off Sale” consumption and for no other purpose whatsoever.”

Defendants filed an answer denying that they had violated the covenant and stating that the covenant was intended only to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Majestic Co. v. Orpheum Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe StoresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Goldberg v. PearlIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. WicklineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  2. Amos v. CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Stevens v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API