Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Lubar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 31, 1942No. 7965PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Abe Orleans loaned approximately $900 to Rosenblum and Hartman. He took from them a promissory note in the amount of $1,000, payable in $20 weekly installments and secured by a chattel deed of trust. He endorsed the note to the District Finance Corporation. Thereafter, Nathan Lubar, as trustee under the deed of trust, sued in replevin to recover the chattels from Hartman and Rosenblum. During the trial Hartman offered to prove that Abe Orleans was the principal stockholder and President of the District Finance Company; that Lubar was an officer and counsel for the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Burck v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Brown v. Southall Realty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Order of Ahepa v. Travel Consultants, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Diamond Housing Corporation v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. SladeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.