Legal Opinion

Ingannamorte v. Kings Super Markets, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 19, 1970PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

The Law Division directed that judgment for possession be entered in favor of the plaintiffs-landlords unless, within thirty days, the defendant-tenant resumes its supermarket operations at the leased premises. The defendant appealed and we certified while the matter was awaiting argument in the Appellate Division. B. 2 :12.

The plaintiffs own a small shopping center in the Borough of Dumont. It consists of a supermarket, which occupies about one-third of the total floor space in the center, and eleven satellite retail stores including, inter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fox v. Fox Valley Trotting ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Lilac Variety, Inc. v. Dallas Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Automatic Laundry Service, Inc. v. DemasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Asling v. McAllister-Fitzgerald Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fashion Fabrics of Iowa, Inc. v. Retail Investors Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Slater v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. Kroger Co. v. Bonny Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API