Legal Opinion

Gimenez v. Rissen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1936No. Civ. 9567PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

These appeals are prosecuted from judgments entered upon directed verdicts. By stipulation the two cases were tried together, and by agreement both appeals were consolidated for consideration together in this court.

The actions were for damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiffs, who were guests in an automobile which overturned on Jefferson Avenue, approximately a block east of Higuera Street, in Culver City, about midnight, February 12, 1933. Their respective mothers were joined as plaintiffs in the capacity of guardians ad litem. Named as defendants…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Jenkins v. North Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Parsons v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API