Legal Opinion
Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of Chisholm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1939No. 31,957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Appeal from an order denying in part and granting in part defendant’s motion for amended findings and denying its motion for a new trial.
The action was instituted by the Chisholm Water Supply Company, a corporation, against the city of Chisholm, a municipal corporation, to recover accrued amounts with interest and attorneys’ fees alleged to be due for water taken between November, 1936, and August, 1937, by defendant from the wells of plaintiff in pursuance of a certain contract entered into between the parties on November 3, 1931. In its answer defendant denied the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wakely v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Tracy Cement Tile Co. v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- City of Staples v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marty H. Segelbaum, Inc. v. MW CAPITAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Country Club District Service Co. v. Village of EdinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Union Public Service Co. v. Village of MinneotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939