Legal Opinion
Country Club District Service Co. v. Village of Edina
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1943No. 33,052PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pirsig, Justice.
Action to recover for services rendered by plaintiff for defendant through the use of fire hydrants and storm sewers.
In 1922 Thorpe Bros., a corporation engaged in real estate business, purchased a 300-acre tract of land known as Browndale Farm in the village of Edina located outside of, but adjacent to, the southwest end of the city of Minneapolis. It proceeded to convert the tract into a suburban residential district. The area was platted into the Brown Section, on the west, and the Fairway Section, on the east, and the whole was called the Country Club District. In order to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Abbott Realty Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- In Re Trust Under Will of ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Derby Heights, Inc. v. Gantt Water & Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Stegall v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.