Legal Opinion
Union Public Service Co. v. Village of Minneota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 20, 1942No. Nos. 33,012, 33,013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
In July 1940 the Union Public Service Company, a corporation of this state,, sued the village of Minneota and its officers and common council for a declaratory judgment that ordinance No. 165 was in force and effect. In December of 1940 the company instituted an action in m,andamus to compel the president of the village council of the village of Minneota to sign ordinance No. 165 and the recorder to attest it and to compel the publication of the ordinance as required by law. In both suits answers and return were interposed presenting the issues to be tried. The two suits were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Gormley v. DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Carpenter v. Yeadon BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Village of Minneota v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Behrendt v. RassmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- L.C. Canyon Partners, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2011