Legal Opinion

Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of Chisholm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1939No. 32,275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In an action brought by plaintiff against the city of Chisholm to recover for water furnished the city for the ten months preceding September 1, 1937, under a written contract, plaintiff prevailed. The trial was to the court, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were made awarding recovery for the full amount asked. Defendant moved for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law or a new trial. The motion was denied, except that additional facts were found which had no effect upon the conclusions of law. On appeal to this court the decision Avas affirmed. 205 Minn. 215, 285 N. W.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Johnston Harvester Co. v. ClareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Johnson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Vanderburgh v. VanderburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Kingsley v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Perkins v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API