Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bayly Bros.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1942No. Civ. 12914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs, as stockholders, each owning one share of preferred stock of Bayly Bros., Inc. of California, a corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “Bayly Bros.”), brought this action to enforce certain alleged rights of that corporation, on allegations that its board of directors, all of whom are among the defendants, refused to act in the matter. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment adverse to them rendered on a motion for a nonsuit.

The facts presented by the record are many and complicated, but only a part of them are important to a consideration of the point which we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Payne v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Rosenfeld v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. DeBaun v. First Western Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API