Payne v. Elliot
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twelfth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Daingerfield, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, McKee, J.:
This is an action of trover. The plaintiff seeks to charge defendants with $2,796.32 and costs, for an alleged conversion *340of one hundred shares of the stock of the “ Northern Belle Mill and Mining Company,” and also to have them adjudged guilty of fraud. The complaint was demurred to on several grounds, and the demurrer overruled. Defendants afterward answered, and, upon a trial had in the absence of defendants and their attorneys, the Court gave judgment for the plaintiff for the amount sued for, in gold coin, and also adjudged that the defendants were guilty of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ayres v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Atkins v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Anderson v. . NicholasNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Boylan v. HuguetNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Pierce v. GilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.