Legal Opinion

Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1952No. Civ. 14814PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

These appeals present another round in the legal battles between the members of the Dandini family, their successors in interest, and the corporations • they control or have controlled. Two of these controversies have already been before this court. (Remillard Brick Co. v. Dandini, 98 Cal.App.2d 617 [220 P.2d 927]; Dandini v. Dandini, 82 Cal.App.2d 263 [186 P.2d 41].) According to the briefs and pleadings, other actions are pending in the trial court or are on appeal.

The present controversy involves four corporations and several members of their boards of directors. The corporations are:

1.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Shlensky v. South Parkway Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API