Legal Opinion

In Re Moynihan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The Oregon State Bar on January 21, 1937, filed a complaint against M. Clifford Moynihan, a duly admitted attorney of the state of Oregon, charging him with falsely testifying with intent to mislead and deceive the circuit court of the state of Oregon for Marion county, and with signing an untrue and false affidavit to be used in a cause pending in that court, with like intent to deceive and mislead. The trial committee found Mr. Moynihan guilty of both charges and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for three years. The Board of Governors, after hearing oral argument by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re John PercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In re UlmerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913
  5. Homan v. HirschOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CarstensOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LenskeOregon Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API