Legal Opinion
In re Ulmer
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 29, 1913PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Proceedings for the disbarment of Reo Ulmer.
1Opinion of the Court
KILLITS, District Judge»
The facts in this matter appear sufficiently from the rule nisi entered by the court on the 5th of April, 1913, as follows:
“Whereas, during the February, 1913, term of this court, to wit, on the 24th to the 29th days of March, 1913, inclusive, one Dan Ulmer was on trial in this court before a jury at the prosecution of the United States upon an indictment charging the said Dan Ulmer with perjury; and
“Whereas, one Leo Ulmer, a member of the bar of this court, and son of said defendant, Dan Ulmer, was present at said trial during each session of the court therein and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Saunders v. Piggly Wiggly CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
- United States v. DachisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- In Re MoynihanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.