Legal Opinion

Homan v. Hirsch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.

This is a suit to foreclose as a mortgage a deed purporting on its face absolutely to convey to the plaintiff certain city lots at Ontario, Oregon. About June, 1919, the defendant Hirsch began to transact business with the Ontario National Bank. In the main the usual course of business was for him to draw drafts on some party in Wisconsin, generally P. L. Ooerling, which drafts he would .deposit with the bank and afterwards draw checks against them as upon a cash deposit. This method of business continued until February of the following year, the drafts increasing in size and frequency.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Stucky v. Masonic Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Barbour v. PriestSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Tumlin v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re MoynihanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sitton v. PeyreeOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Gray v. LittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API