Legal Opinion
Brown v. Rosen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 22, 1994No. 13895PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendants appeal from the discharge of a purchaser’s lien. The plaintiffs, Merle C. Brown and Jo Anne Brown, have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely and for lack of a final judgment. We deny the motion.
The facts are not in dispute. The defendants, Gary Rosen and Susan Rosen, held a purchaser’s lien on the plaintiffs’ property located at 54 Cross Highway, Red-ding, pursuant to General Statutes § 49-92a.1 The plaintiffs commenced an action to discharge that lien on the basis that it was invalid under the provisions of § 49-92a. The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MalkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BoucherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Kioukis v. KioukisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Guerin v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Rocque v. DeMilo and Co., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. PetersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Midland Funding, LLC v. TrippConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. LanasaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.